DISCLOSURE This page contains affiliate links to Hubstaff, Clockify. If you purchase through these links, we earn a commission at no cost to you. Rankings are based on independent testing — affiliate relationships do not influence verdicts.

Hubstaff vs Clockify: Monitoring Features vs Clean Simplicity for Remote Teams

TOOL A

Hubstaff

7.8/10

TOOL B

Clockify

7.9/10

Verdict by use case

Use case	Winner	Why
Employee monitoring (screenshots, activity scores)	Hubstaff	Hubstaff has native screenshot capture at configurable intervals, keyboard/mouse activity scoring, GPS tracking, and app/URL monitoring. Clockify has none of these. If monitoring is a requirement, Hubstaff is the only choice between these two.
Free tier for unlimited users	Clockify	Clockify's free plan covers unlimited users with unlimited time tracking, project management, and basic reports. Hubstaff has no meaningful free tier — the cheapest paid plan starts at $4.99/user/mo with a 14-day trial.
Basic time tracking for a trust-first remote team	Clockify	Clockify tracks time without surveillance. Hubstaff's monitoring features exist in the product even on plans that don't enable them — the psychological effect on team culture is the same. For a team where trust is important, Clockify avoids this entirely.
GPS and field worker time tracking	Hubstaff	Hubstaff's mobile app has native GPS tracking, geofenced clock-in/out, and field crew features. Clockify has a mobile timer but no GPS or geofencing.
Payroll integration	Hubstaff	Hubstaff has payroll processing features (automatic payroll via integrated payment methods) and stronger payroll export than Clockify. Clockify integrates with payroll tools via export but doesn't process payroll.
Total cost at 20 employees	Clockify	Clockify free: £0. Clockify Standard: $5.49/user/mo ($1,318/yr for 20 users). Hubstaff Starter: $4.99/user/mo ($1,198/yr for 20 users) — marginally cheaper paid, but Clockify's free plan covers most small teams.

The honest comparison framing

Comparing Hubstaff and Clockify as if they’re equivalent tools with different feature sets misses the point. They represent different philosophies about remote work management:

Hubstaff’s philosophy: remote employees need to be verifiable. Screenshots at configurable intervals, keyboard/mouse activity scores, GPS tracking, and app/URL monitoring give managers evidence of work. The tool is explicitly designed for employers who need to verify remote work output.

Clockify’s philosophy: time data is useful for project management and billing. Employees track where their time goes. No verification layer. The data is a productivity tool, not a surveillance tool.

Choosing between them is not a feature decision — it’s a management decision.

Feature comparison

Feature	Hubstaff	Clockify
Time tracking (timer)	Yes	Yes
Manual time entry	Yes	Yes
Project and task tracking	Yes	Yes
Billable rate tracking	Yes	Yes (paid plans)
Screenshots	Yes (configurable intervals)	No
App/URL monitoring	Yes	No
Activity score (keyboard/mouse)	Yes	No
GPS tracking	Yes	No
Geofenced clock-in	Yes	No
Payroll processing	Yes (basic)	No (export only)
Free tier	No (14-day trial)	Yes (unlimited users)
Reporting	Strong	Good
Integrations	30+	50+
Mobile app	Strong (GPS, geofencing)	Adequate (timer, manual)

Pricing comparison

Plan	Hubstaff	Clockify
Free	Not available	Yes (unlimited users)
Entry paid	$4.99/user/mo (Starter)	$5.49/user/mo (Standard)
Mid tier	$7.50/user/mo (Grow)	$7.99/user/mo (Pro)
20 users, annual	$1,198–$1,800/yr	$0–$1,918/yr

The free tier difference is decisive for small teams. A 5–20 person team that can use Clockify’s free plan saves $600–$1,200/yr vs Hubstaff’s starter plan. The savings justify evaluating Clockify first, unless monitoring is a clear requirement.

The monitoring decision

If you’re considering Hubstaff because you have concerns about remote employee productivity, consider whether the underlying problem is:

A hiring/management problem: unclear expectations, poor performance feedback, wrong role fit. Monitoring doesn’t fix any of these. It reveals that someone is unproductive after the fact, but doesn’t change the cause.

A process problem: workers don’t know what to work on, or the work isn’t organised clearly enough. A project management tool (not monitoring) fixes this.

A genuine compliance requirement: government contracting, legal billing, insurance-required verification. These are the scenarios where Hubstaff’s monitoring is legitimate and necessary.

If your answer is compliance requirement, use Hubstaff. If your answer is management concern, address the management problem first.

When each tool is right

Choose Hubstaff if:

You have a genuine compliance or insurance requirement for activity verification
You manage a field or mobile workforce that needs GPS clock-in/out
Your payroll workflow benefits from integrated payroll processing
You need screenshots as an audit trail for client billing disputes

Choose Clockify if:

Your team needs time tracking for project management and billing, not verification
Budget is tight — the free plan covers unlimited users
Team trust and adoption rate are the priority
You want time data without the management relationship cost of monitoring

Consider Toggl Track instead of either if:

You want the cleanest manual time tracking UX with high adoption
Budget allows $9/user/mo for the premium features (required fields enforcement, project budgets)